Loving the faith, Not the Follower

by April Terry (personal blog at http://faithwarming.blogspot.com)

I recently came across an article at CNN.com  about Anne Rice leaving Christianity.  Read the fine print in the article and you find that it isn’t so much that she is leaving Christianity as it is that she’s leaving Christians.  Sometimes, I just can’t blame her.  I’ve felt that same pull to move in the exact opposite direction of many members of the body of Christ as well.  I find myself loving the faith, but not the follower.

I haven’t met too many people who didn’t like Jesus.  He’s a pretty popular guy even among atheists and those in other religions.  What most people object to is the way that Christianity is often boiled down to a few issues and a lot of judgments about what makes a Christian a Christian.  I believe that it’s a shallow look at a faith of great depth and beauty, but I’ve felt it myself in many ways.   Our ministry affords us the opportunity to minister to people in a direct and hands-on way, but when we start offering services to churches of various creeds, we find that we are questioned about where we stand politically, religiously, and morally.  While I can understand the questions, I have difficulty understanding why we would no longer be welcome to assist a church whose political affiliations were different from our own.  Yet, that is the reality.

Those who are new to Christianity these days often find that they like Jesus, but not Christians.   Because some are more outspoken than others, it’s hard to remember that we are a diverse body of Christ.  Christians range from gay pastors to members of the religious right, from snake handlers to purple-haired hosts on TBN, from pastors with cool hair to the austerity of the Amish.  With that diverse of a community, it is hard to believe that there could be a stereotypical Christian or Christianity, for that matter.

Sometimes, I wonder what Jesus would think about His followers today.  If he spent six months walking the countryside, would he marvel at the faith outside the church and shake his head at the lack of it within?  Would he love us all for our differences or reprimand us for our lack of unity?

Maybe we Christians need to start talking about what we agree on, rather than what we disagree on.   A friend of mine recently told me that the recent death of a family member brought together three brothers of her family.  None of the brothers had seen one another for five years since a political discussion had divided them.    That’s a tragedy that we must work to overcome in our faith as well.  Why should secondary issues, such as politics, set us apart from one another?

We tend to minimize the damage done when we polarize our faith.  We tell ourselves that we are standing for what we believe, but how much damage have we done by our efforts to coerce others into our way of thinking?  There is a better way—a greater kind of love often bridges any differences that might exist.

Each week, I have lunch with a different kind of Christian from myself.  She and I can have political discussions without getting angry at one another, and often, we agree quite well on many things.  Of course, I am careful.  I have to be careful that I don’t make any broad statements that I know will offend and she is careful with me.  We have practiced a simple virtue called civility.  This civility means that we don’t make assumptions about one another, we don’t try to win the other to our side, but instead, we champion the efforts that each of us are making in our faith walk.  My friend doesn’t try to change the way I believe, she is content with the fact that I do believe.  I feel the same.  At the end of the journey, our politics, methodology, and our differences will ultimately matter very little because it will be our love for Jesus that will be the binding that holds each chapter together. 

I wish for Anne Rice to have that kind of Christian friend.  One who will stand alongside her and be her faith champion, there to cheer her when she works hard for the faith and to give her a hand when she feels like a failure.   More than that, I wish we could all be that kind of Christian friend.

August 2nd, 2010 · 3 Comments

Categories: DE Thoughts

3 Comments so far »

  1. Randy Siever said

    am August 2 2010 @ 11:29 am

    Welcome back, A! Missed you!

    Thanks for the thoughtful commentary this morning. Personally I totally identified with Anne’s dilemma. She is not alone…not by a long shot (see UnChristian). I fear that many Christians will pooh-pooh her decision as being an unwillingness to obey the scriptures or a distaste for some other part of orthodoxy (meaning her decision was to have Jesus on her own terms). While this may eventually prove to be the case, I think the assumption misses a glaring reality: Christianity (and therefore, sadly, Christians) has a bad rep in the world. We have become (at least in the media, where we are most visible) mean spirited, arrogant and condemning to anyone who disagrees with us. This is what Anne is rejecting…association with the jerks who have maligned the name of Jesus with their self-righteous behavior and conduct.

    Of course Jim Henderson, Todd Hunter and Craig Spinks have made (along with the brilliant David Kinnaman in his book UnChristian) this point vivid in their new DVB (a book and dvd combo) called “The Outsider Interviews; A New Generation Speaks Out on Chrisianity” I did a quick review of that work here:
    http://doableevangelism.com/2010/07/12/the-outsider-interviews-a-dvb/

  2. Jim Henderson said

    am August 2 2010 @ 1:05 pm

    April

    very thoughtful piece. You did a great job articulating the problem and providing a real life solution for anyone caring to actually do something about it. Someone once said “you can act your way to a new set of feelings faster than you can feel your way to a new set of actions”. Lead on

  3. Randy Siever said

    am August 2 2010 @ 4:27 pm

    April,
    Totally agree with Jim. Way to go.

    Jim,
    You said,

    Someone once said “you can act your way to a new set of feelings faster than you can feel your way to a new set of actions”.

    I totally agree with this, and have actual personal experience with it that sort of cements the principle for me. But I’m now curious.

    I’ve heard you say several times, “People tend to do what they feel, not what they think.” Or something like that. Anyway, does this mean that real change involves acting our way to a new feeling, which leads to acting in a new way? (not acting, as in pretending…but action)

    Just thinking outloud.

Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Name: (Required)

eMail: (Required)

Website:

Comment:

Subscribe without commenting